It seems like a lot of people in my age bracket are talking about the effects of Purity Culture on our generation of young adults in the late 90's and early 2000's. Perhaps some of you reading this experienced it, and perhaps others saw your children or siblings experience it.
From what I see, the general consensus today seems to be that Purity Culture was a negative thing, and had a damaging impact on young people. Not everyone thinks this, and there are some who still follow it. I must confess to having some mixed feelings about both opinions. In order to explain, I need to share my own experience, and more importantly, look to the Bible.
I grew up in a Christian home in the 1980's and 90's. As early as I remember, my parents told me that if it were God's will for me to be married (for single life can be God's will too), God's man for me would be a Christian, and that it was unwise to even entertain the idea of a relationship with a man who wasn't saved. That is biblical (Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers... Second Corinthians 6:14).
|
Me as a little girl in the 80's, around the time my mom had the talk with me... |
I was taught the facts of life when I was about six. I remember sitting on my parents' bed beside my mother as she read me a book called The Wonderful Way Babies are Made. I learned and understood more as I hit puberty. Sex was for marriage, and for me, marriage was only to a Christian man. My parents didn't hammer this into me. It was brought up naturally. They didn't have a lot of rules surrounding it. I never remember being told at what age I could date or have a boyfriend. I definitely wasn't told that I had to court or have my parents arrange or manage my relationships when I got older. I only knew "courting" from TV shows set in the 19th century, like Little House on the Prairie. I just thought it was an old-fashioned word for dating.
My parents' marriage was an example to me. As of right now in 2024, I am almost 43 years old, and my parents have been married for 45 years (I'm their oldest). But it has to be admitted that one's parents (while the biggest and most important example) don't make one's heart pound with passion. I believe God gave me other examples, through godly books and other media, that accomplished that (in conjunction with the example of my parents, of course). I believe God gave me some ideals to hold out for, which were His best for me.
There were a lot of mixed messages out there in the world. Even wholesome, G-rated family TV shows from my generation depicted the central characters dating seriously in junior high and high school, sometimes making out passionately. This was portrayed as "normal" and as if it was just what teens (even young teens) were expected to do. It also showed these teen romances being disposable, with breakups and then getting with a new significant other being seen as part of everyday life.
A lot of my friends felt that these shows were meant to depict reality, and felt they didn't measure up if they didn't have a boyfriend. Dating became more of a game than a chance to meet people and like them for themselves. It also seemed like it got a lot of people into trouble. The TV shows might have depicted the characters kissing and stopping at that, but in real life, many of us know that it's very hard to stop with just kissing. Passions can carry us much further than intended.
Almost out of nowhere, along came the Purity movement. By the time it gained traction, I was almost an adult. I was sixteen when I Kissed Dating Goodbye came out. It was one of many, many books on the subject of purity. There were rallies, conferences, books, videos, groups, paraphernalia...you name it. Initially, I agreed with what it seemed to be saying. It removed the pressure to feel the need to date. The focus was on becoming the person God wanted you to be. I still agree with that. I wouldn't make a hard, fast rule against teens having a romantic relationship. Some godly teens meet the person they'll end up marrying while still young. You have to take it on a case by case basis. But the way it was being portrayed on TV and in the overall culture was not good, and I liked the idea that I didn't have to worry about that, but could focus on what God wanted me to do. So that part of Purity Culture seemed good.
I also 100% agree with abstinence until marriage. First Corinthians 6:18 urges believers to Flee fornication... The Bible makes it clear in multiple places that intimacy is between a husband and wife (Genesis 2:24; Matthew 19:5). That is something else I agree with about the Purity Movement. What it wanted was good. Purity itself is good. So flee youthful passions and pursue righteousness, faith, love, and peace, along with those who call on the Lord from a pure heart. 2 Timothy 2:2
While I agree with what I have stated above, I can't say I agreed with the Purity movement as a whole. Christian counselor and author Camden Morgante makes the distinction between traditional Biblical teaching (which I believe) and the Purity Culture (which also believed this, but added many more rules that were extra-biblical). Morgante was featured in a podcast I follow The Best of You with Christian psychologist Alison Cook. In this episode, they discussed Morgante's book Recovering from Purity Culture. I have not read the book, but I highly recommend listening to the podcast, which I'll put at the end.
Before Purity Culture struck, I had a boyfriend in junior high. It was very innocent. Really, we were two kids who liked each other and hung out together. That was basically it. He told me I was beautiful once, at our Christmas formal, and I almost melted. I fantasized about him proposing to me after that. In all my imaginations of this, he always dropped to one knee, and pulled out a diamond ring, and asked me to marry him. I would say, Of course I will! and we'd seal the deal with a kiss. This never happened, of course. Junior high romances don't usually result in marriage. 12-and-13-year-old girls fantasize about getting engaged, but boys of the same age typically do not! They're not there yet. This boy certainly was not. I was very serious about the Lord, and God revealed to me that this boyfriend was not. He was from a Christian family, but I'm not even 100% sure he was saved. After that relationship, I felt called to wait until I was 18 and out of high school to think about dating or having another boyfriend. To this day, I think that was a good decision. It was my own choice, which I believed God led me to make. I don't put that on anyone else.
Even though I initially agreed with what the Purity Movement seemed to encourage (waiting until you were an adult to get serious in a relationship, and abstinence until marriage), I started seeing some weird things. Families we knew took it as almost another gospel (and perhaps that's what it became). Instead of the Gospel of grace and forgiveness, made possible by Jesus, it became the message that you had this one chance to get it right, and if you went out with someone you didn't end up marrying (even if no sex happened) you had cheated on your future spouse in advance, and you didn't have your whole heart to give away on your wedding day. There was no redemption. There was no way to get back on the right track if you failed in any way. Perfection was demanded. This is so counter to the real Gospel, which gives us that hope and a future (First Corinthians 2:9). Males and females had very strictly-defined roles, and if you accidentally didn't follow your script, you had committed the unpardonable sin (forget whether or not what you did was actually a sin according to the Bible). Other people (sometimes parents, sometimes pastors, sometimes other mentors) had a lot of control over the couple's relationship. This started to seem wrong to me. Where was this in the Bible? It wasn't.
With dating taken off the table as an option, many young people started being passive-aggressive. They had their little boyfriend/girlfriend stuff going on, but didn't officially call it that. They were "just friends" who held hands, ran their fingers through each other's hair, and gazed into each other's eyes constantly. Just friends my foot! A lot of flirting still happened, but no one would stand behind it and actually admit they liked each other, because if they did, they might be giving pieces of their hearts away and ruin their future marriages. I found this so hypocritical. Even assuming for the sake of argument that the Purity Movement was right, these people were all still as impure as those who officially had relationships. Jesus made it clear in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7) that sin starts in the heart, and officially committing the act outwardly isn't really where it should be defined. So, if that is true, these fakers were just as guilty as their "officially dating" counterparts. Since I think the Purity Movement was wrong about some of this, I'll go out on a limb and say these people were more guilty, because they weren't dealing in the truth. (You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free, John 8:32).
Even though the idea was purity, the focus was on sex--how sinful it was outside of marriage, but how wonderful it was within. An idol was made of sex, it seemed. Some people now say they were promised a perfect sex-life in marriage if they followed all the rules. I'm also hearing it referred to as the sexual prosperity gospel. I can see why they would call it that. I was never given any of these odd promises of perfect sex, but I knew some were. Even in my experiences, the emphasis was on sex, which was ironic, considering they were trying to discourage it among teens.
For a couple of years as a young adult (aged 18-20), I had a roller coaster relationship with a young man I met doing mission work. There was a very strong chemistry. He came on very strongly, and he made me uncomfortable. However, I was interested, and felt a strong mix of attraction to him and repulsion at how strongly he was coming across that I had a hard time wading through. Some of it was embarrassing, while other parts were wonderful.
One of the ways he came onto me shortly after we met was in a class we were taking. He stared at me, his eyes bulging out. That made me feel almost offended, and I ignored it. He started tapping me, and I still ignored him. Finally, he held the pen he was using in front of my face. It was from one of those rallies, and said TRUE LOVE WAITS across the side of it. He pointed at himself, then me, and winked. My heart stood still and my blood froze. What was he saying? It felt like he was using his abstinence pen to actually make a sexual advance, or propose to me, or something! I honestly didn't know how to take it. It was at very least, a little flirtatious way to say, "Hey, I like you," but the emphasis on what true love "waits" to do kind of made me feel nauseous. He had only met me a few days earlier at ministry headquarters. Everyone thought he was perfect, and that any problem was my fault. This gave me the message that to be in love means to be uncomfortable and allow someone I'm attracted to to go further than I feel right about. Marriage was brought up, hinted at, flirted about--but always with a sexual undertone. Ultimately, that relationship didn't work out. He wasn't ready for anything, even though he had communicated otherwise, and come on so strongly. My heart and spirit were ravaged by that experience.
The relationship ended when I told him I was making important life decisions and needed to know where we stood. I confessed my feelings for him. He took this opportunity to deny everything. I felt hurt and embarrassed. I felt played for the fool. And the Purity Movement was on his side. He had been manipulative, which was allowed under the Purity Culture rules (hypocrisy was okay, just not officially committing to anything). He was the man, and could do whatever he wanted. I was the woman, and (according to what everyone in that movement was saying) I had been wrong to deny his advances (which I had at times), and then question his intentions. According to leaders like Elisabeth Elliot and Joshua Harris, I was supposed to let this guy waste my time and play with my heart. I don't think so! My time and life are valuable, and I don't think God would want me to waste them. Psalm 90:12 says, Teach us to number our days, that we may gain a heart of wisdom.
To be fair and balanced, my husband found the opposite experience. He found the Purity Movement allowed women to be manipulative, and men to be viewed as predators, even if their intentions were honorable. He had a lot of hurtful experiences in Bible College as a result of it. The "right" people were allowed to date/court, but if you weren't in with the right people on campus, you were a predator who was seen as sinning in pursuing a relationship. It was all carnality disguised as virtue.
In my experience with mission trip boyfriend, everyone saw me as wrong and bad. At very least, I was viewed as a liberal (even though I was a staunch Conservative who had recently voted for the first time ever for George W. Bush in the 2000 election). My actual beliefs and views didn't matter, though. I was some crazy extremist who had given my heart away and could never have a good marriage now, unless this same guy came back into my life, because I had given a piece of my heart to him, so he was the only one I could be with and be fulfilled. Do you see how wrong this teaching was, and where it could lead if you follow it to its logical conclusion?
Every book I read about the subject (in desperately trying to find answers to what I had gone through) just condemned me, because they basically all said that women weren't supposed to confront men, ever, under any circumstance. Elisabeth Elliot's Passion and Purity almost left me wondering if she believed men had a right to rape women and women couldn't resist. I hasten to add that she didn't say this at all, but her logic that women couldn't ever question or confront men led me to wonder where she believed the line could be drawn? By the way, I am still that staunch Conservative, both biblically and politically, but I think the gender roles of the Purity Movement are absolutely reprehensible!
As it turned out (surprise, surprise) the only book that helped me was the Bible, and I realized it was the only book I needed. All these Purity books were worthless to me. They were only good for people who were still perfect (to be perfect in that movement meant you'd never liked someone who wasn't your future spouse yet--if you'd been dumped, you were damaged goods. If you'd even sat with someone at an event or let him walk you to class, and he didn't end up being your husband, you were damaged goods!). The Bible, on the other hand, was for us sinners who need help! That was me!
It needs to be stated that it has since come out that Elisabeth Elliot was in an abusive marriage (her third marriage after being widowed twice) when she wrote Passion and Purity. It has also come out that her second marriage (while extremely happy prior to his death) had some ungodly things in the beginning of it (he was still married to his dying wife when he began pursuing Elisabeth, and she accepted this). What does that prove about her narrow-minded and extra-biblical advice? And the poster child for the Purity Movement, Joshua Harris, ended up divorced and leaving the faith. Again, what does that say about all his legalistic claims? Another who pushed some of the sexist rhetoric of the Purity Movement was Bill Gothard (whom I did not follow in any way), the founder and leader of the Institute of Basic Life Principles. Sexual abuse was eventually uncovered in this organization, and Gothard's life himself, and he was removed from leadership. Again, what is the takeaway when those pushing these things (which really aren't even biblical) fail to live up to them?
|
Joshua and Shannon Harris early in their marriage (late 90s or early 2000s)--their facade of perfection was still firmly in place. They allegedly had all the answers. They were on top of the world, and I was on the bottom. |
I was left in a pit of despair, but the Holy Spirit spoke to my heart, and with His help, and with God's word, I moved forward in my life. While I don't encourage women to throw themselves at men (for their own dignity's sake!), I don't think it is a sin for women to speak up or call men to account. I clarify that it isn't a sin for anyone to question another if misleading behavior is happening. Men and women should honor each other, and be honored. I do believe the Bible gives some guidelines for men and women, but not like the Purity Culture. I didn't sin with this mission trip boyfriend. He did. It took years to get him out of my system. Some lines had been crossed, even if they "technically" didn't violate the Purity Culture's rules. It was a chance for me to deny myself, take up my cross, and follow Jesus, in spite of what I felt. In God's timing, I met my wonderful husband--the one God had led me to hold out for long before, as a young girl. It has been better than I ever imagined! God has been so faithful. He is SO much better for me in every way! He didn't play games or hint around.
|
Our wedding picture--no facade of perfection, just the joy of being with the one God gave me--and we still have that joy! |
Some people ended up in godly, happy marriages as a result of the Purity Movement. Some chose to live by biblical principles of waiting to have sex until marriage. Some took from it that they didn't have to be consumed with dating as a teen. If the Purity Movement helped someone wait on God for their spouse in a biblical way, then that's great. But the extra-biblical advice hurt many. It made navigating relationships confusing, because everyone was terrified to take any sort of initiative, lest they give a piece of their heart away and then be damaged goods. These fears, and the manipulative behavior they spawned, are not of God in any way. The graceless teachings are not of God (look at how God redeemed the prostitute Rahab--allowing her to marry into Israel and be an ancestor of Jesus--see Joshua 2-6; Matthew 1:5; Hebrews 11:31). The very specific gender roles are not of God (God does have plans for male and female, but He doesn't put anyone into THAT narrow of a box--just read the Bible for men and women who took uncharacteristic action--Gideon, Deborah, Ruth, Esther, John the Baptist--for starters!). Nowhere in the Bible will you find a step-by-step direction for how dating/courtship should be done (the few places where romantic pursuits are recorded, they are simply the stories of those experiencing them, not commands of God on how to do it). Rather than focusing on that, we should be focusing on living for Christ in all areas of life. The Bible and indwelling power of the Holy Spirit are to be our guide.
While I say this, not only it is hard for me to think back on the false teachings in the Purity Movement, but it is equally hard to hear it complained against and completely discarded for the opposite extreme of unbridled sex. Many my age who are leaving the faith (they call it deconstructing) state the Purity Movement as their gripe with Jesus and Christianity. That is so wrong, because they are not the same thing. They are not synonyms. God has so much better than the world offers, and He has so much better than well-meaning Purity Movement proponents offer. What Jesus offers is real--Himself.
Some were affected a lot more profoundly than I was by the Purity Culture. Some had families and churches that really pushed it to the extreme. Some now say there was a lot of shaming about sexuality and natural feelings and desires. I never experienced that, but if anyone did, that's not of God either. God offers His people redemption and wholeness. No matter how much you've messed up (legitimate sin, or just not following certain man-made standards) there is always hope.
While it had some good qualities, thinking about the Purity Culture always makes me feel hopeless. I was incapable of living up to it. I think many felt that way. It made false promises it could not keep. It offered security in certain behavior, instead of in a relationship with Christ. It shamed people for having perfectly natural desires, rather than teaching them how to navigate them biblically. Jesus offers more. Read His word for your sense of self-worth and purpose. Rest in His presence and let His Holy Spirit minister to your soul. Wrestle with truths you don't understand, making them your own as the Lord reveals more and more of Himself to you. That's what my early 20's looked like, and I am the better for it today.
Purity is of God, but the Purity Movement had many unbiblical teachings that were adapted into Christianity, becoming a false gospel in a sense. Anytime we allow extra-biblical teachings in, it's not going to be good. That's how cults and false religions start. Read books for what they are, but go to the Bible for real counsel. Many in the Purity Movement perfectly followed the principles in it, but failed miserably where it really counted. Don't be like that. Do it where it counts.
Listen to Alison Cook and Camden Morgante discuss Purity Culture here.